• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Virtualization.com

Virtualization.com

News and insights from the vibrant world of virtualization and cloud computing

  • News
  • Featured
  • Partnerships
  • People
  • Acquisitions
  • Guest Posts
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Funding

Forrester

KACE Introduces Virtual Kontainers

March 25, 2009 by Robin Wauters Leave a Comment

KACE today announced KACE Virtual Kontainers to help companies dramatically simplify the distribution and management of applications. This announcement comes on the heels of new Forrester Business Data Services (BDS) research that reported a whopping 74 percent of small- to medium-sized businesses are looking to desktop and application virtualization to solve their costly PC management challenges.

Application virtualization solutions are notorious for their high cost and complexity. KACE Virtual Kontainers, the first technology innovation resulting from KACE’s acquisition of Computers in Motion, provides users with an easier, faster, and significantly less expensive alternative for creating, deploying, and managing virtual applications. What’s more, KACE offers all these functions via a single, integrated Web-based console. KACE Virtual Kontainers is the newest addition to KACE’s award-winning KBOX family of systems management and deployment appliances and the latest technology innovation that saves customers significant time and money.

With KACE Virtual Kontainers, KACE pushes traditional application virtualization technologies to a new level by extending the benefits beyond the features typically associated with these solutions. Some of the new features of KACE Virtual Kontainers include:

  • Application Isolation – isolated applications eliminate the need for traditional application installation and removal to avoid the decay that occurs when installing and removing application files over time;
  • Simple and Fully Automated Creation – KACE Virtual Kontainers are easily created without the need of specialized skills so experienced (and more expensive) personnel need not waste time learning yet another way of doing business;
  • Centralized Appliance-Based Management – centralized management provides an intuitive Web-based console that allows management of the entire application lifecycle from anywhere via an easy-to-deploy appliance;
  • Active Metering and Control – in order to better manage the use of applications across a corporate network, active metering enables complete control of where and when applications may be executed based on location, hours used, and even on the number of available licenses to enforce concurrent license limits.

KACE Virtual Kontainers will be generally available in April.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: application distribution, application management, Forrester, Kace, Kace Kbox, KACE Virtual Kontainers, Kbox, virtual kontainers, virtualisation, virtualization

Forrester Analyst: Storage Virtualization Is Overhyped

May 8, 2008 by Robin Wauters Leave a Comment

An interesting article at ITPro cites Forrester Research analyst Andrew Reichman claiming storage virtualization to be still a marginalized business despite being a hot topic for a few years now. Reichman told attendees of Compellent’s C-Drive customer conference in Minneapolis that just 17 percent of companies have virtualized their storage systems in some way, with another nine percent in the process of rolling out the technology, while 28 percent are interested in the idea.

“Virtualisation of storage is tepid,” Reichman said. “I would characterise it as tepid.”

Reichman said that virtualization is still seen as a little bit leading edge for some companies, and that they’re waiting for others to adopt the technology first.

“Any change is tough – storage is probably the most conservative part of data centres. People don’t want to take the chance on disrupting their data,” he said, adding companies are “kicking the tires but not really buying it.”

Read the rest of the article here.

Filed Under: Interviews, People Tagged With: Andrew Reichman, Forrester, Forrester Research, storage virtualization, virtualisation, virtualization

Server Virtualization Goes Mainstream

April 11, 2006 by Robin Wauters Leave a Comment

Latest Forrester study on virtualization.

According to a recent Forrester study, server virtualization has quickly surpassed other forms of infrastructure virtualization, including techniques for virtualizing storage and networks.

Globally, 75% of 1,221 enterprises surveyed by Forrester say they are aware of server virtualization technologies, 26% have implemented it, and 8% more will pilot it by the summer of 2006.

The rapid adoption of server virtualization can be attributed to its near- and long-term advantages, which allow firms to reduce costs while making their infrastructures more flexible over time. Unlike compute grid technologies, which require architectural changes, server virtualization allows firms to easily encapsulate existing applications into containers that can be moved between physical servers. Forrester believes that this basic capability will prime firms’ data centers for more advanced Organic IT technologies, including automated configuration and distributed workload management.

This Forrester report provides some interesting figures:

* Worldwide Enterprise Awareness Of Server Virtualization Hits 75%
* North American Firms Lead In Adoption Of Server Virtualization
* More Than Half Of The Largest NA Firms Use Or Will Pilot Server Virtualization
* Europe Lags In Awareness But Is Second Overall In Adoption
* In Asia Pacific, Awareness Of Server Virtualization Ranks Second Overall
* VMware Dominates In North America But Microsoft Leads In Europe
* Microsoft Gets More Consideration From Large Enterprises Than Other Enterprises

You can read the full executive summary or order this study at the Forrester source.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Forrester, Forrester Research, server virtualisation, server virtualization, study, virtualisation, virtualization

Is Virtualization the miracle cure for software set-up?

March 31, 2006 by Robin Wauters Leave a Comment

Stephen Shankland at News.Com reports:

Most talk about virtualization these days centers on using server hardware more efficiently. But the technology also has the potential to ease another headache: software installation woes.

 

Today, administrators installing software typically must ensure beforehand that it’s certified to run with their particular hardware and operating systems, then configure and optimize it afterward. The hidden benefit from virtualization is that users can unpack a ready-to-run collection of software components–operating system and all–and drop it onto a fresh, empty partition of the computer called a virtual machine. No muss, no fuss, no driver updates, no configuration file tweaking, no conflicts with other software.Virtualization essentially lets the companies selling the software handle the tricky part also provides a clean slate for installation.There’s one problem, however: Some software licensing plans aren’t designed to accommodate such schemes, though that could eventually change.One convert to the approach is Open Xchange, a server software company that lets customers download its software packaged into a virtual machine so they can quickly get to the evaluation stage. Within the next six months, the company plans to release software for production use, not just testing, said Dan Kusnetzky, executive vice president of marketing strategy. “We send an image that (has) a complete stack of software preinstalled, set up and ready to go,” Kusnetzky said. “We felt it would be an advantage in the competitive marketplace,” he said, because without the virtual machine approach, “it took a level of expertise to install it.” Representatives from three powers in the virtualization realm–EMC subsidiary VMware, its XenSource with the open-source Xen software and Microsoft with the proprietary Virtual Server software–all believe at a minimum that the idea has potential. But it’s VMware, which leads the virtualization market, that’s working hardest to make virtual machine-based installation a reality–and to make its underlying virtual machine technology the foundation of choice. It has a Web site where people can download sample virtual-machine-based packages from Oracle, IBM and others. “The reasons it’s going to become mainstream is you can now package your application with the operating system it really wants. You get the exact patch level and everything in the OS that you want,” said VMware President Diane Greene. And it’s particularly useful for small software companies that don’t have engineers to support a wide variety of systems. “They don’t have to necessarily port their software to every possible operating system and every possible version of the operating system.” In recent months, VMware started offering two free ways that customers can try out virtual-machine-based software packages, which it calls virtual appliances. First came VMware Player in 2005, good for desktop applications, such as an isolated partition for safely surfing the Internet. In February came part two: VMware Server for server tasks. Xen programmers are currently stabilizing their core virtual machine software, but virtual-machine-based installation will happen with Xen, too, predicted Simon Crosby, XenSource co-founder and chief technology officer. “That’s equally possible in Xen…I definitely think it’s going to happen,” Crosby said, though he acknowledged Xen doesn’t yet have VMware’s mature virtual machine management software or established presence at many customer sites.

Licensing lumps

 

Not so fast, cautions Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff. “This is a direction, but not a near-term mainstream change in the way that everyone installs their applications,” Haff said. “There are too many details to work through. Licensing is one issue.” The licensing hurdle stems chiefly from the fact that the installation method requires the inclusion of an operating system, and although software companies might delight in distributing them willy-nilly, operating system companies are more finicky. Microsoft, for example, permits only evaluation copies of Windows to be distributed, and then only within a company and only to test and evaluate software, said James Ni, group product manager for server virtualization at Microsoft. “Currently there is no redistribution of the Windows Server operating system,” Ni said. Right now, the virtual installation idea is about testing software rather than full-on production use, so the evaluation software approach is appropriate, Ni argued. He’s not alone in his assessment. “I would expect this to be primarily about experimentation,” said Forrester analyst Frank Gillett. Ni didn’t close the door to virtual-machine-based software sales. Market forces dictated major changes to Microsoft licensing policies before. For example, Microsoft in 2004 began charging the same price for a dual-core processor as for a single-core processor, and in 2005 started permitting customers with one license for Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition to run as many as four copies on a single server partitioned with virtual machine software. But Microsoft’s policy is an impediment to VMware’s aspiration. Greene sees companies distributing virtual-machine-based software internally today and expects customers will eventually buy it that way, Greene said. “Microsoft is not letting their operating system be used in this model,” Greene said. And though it’s had a more permissive position in the past, it has backed off that stance: “Microsoft did not renew our license to (redistribute) Windows.” Open-source software, of course, has fewer restrictions. “Linux makes it easy,” Gillett said. …

Not just the operating system

Microsoft, Xen and VMware virtualize a computer’s hardware. But some companies tackling the problem at a higher level are offering a different revamp of software installation. SWsoft sells a product called Virtuozzo that essentially virtualizes the operating system rather than the underlying hardware. That lets several programs run at once in separate zones on one instance Linux or Windows. Sun Microsystems has taken the same approach with its “containers” technology in Solaris 10. “We have templates for close to 100 different solutions and applications for various configurations,” said SWsoft Chief Executive Serguei Beloussov. “When you apply a template to a certain virtual private server (a partition), this solution will immediately become available.” …Softricity is another company that tries to break the hard link between operating system and applications. Its software first captures all the modifications a software package makes to Windows, letting companies store employees’ configurations on a central server rather than directly modifying a PC and potentially causing conflicts among different programs. “The applications are no longer bound to the operating system,” said David Greschler, co-founder and vice president of corporate marketing. That lets administrators quickly set up new PCs or update existing ones, he said. It also means employees can move from one PC to another without disruption, because their software is automatically enabled when they log on to a new PC.

Different standards

Yet another complication comes from the fact that VMware, Xen and Microsoft use a different file format for their virtual machines. In August, VMware began trying to standardize its format. That was shortly after Microsoft began offering royalty-free licenses to use its format, called Virtual Hard Disk. And Xen uses a third format, XVM. Barriers between these formats are not insurmountable. For example, XenSource licensed Microsoft’s VHD and will offer the ability to import virtual machines created with Microsoft Virtual Server, Crosby said, and VMware shared its format as well. At the same time, VMware offers support for that feature with its Virtual Machine Importer software. Insurmountable, yes, but barriers nonetheless. “It will tend to retard the movement toward a standard hypervisor level that just sits on top of x86 hardware,” Haff said, adding that low barriers would mean customers could more easily substitute one virtualization company’s product for another. “It is not in VMware’s (or Microsoft’s) business interest to be able to have someone’s free, native hypervisor just slip in to replace ESX Server.” Another hitch stems from cultural obstacles to virtualization in general, Red Hat Chief Executive Matthew Szulik said. “The customers I’ve talked to over the last six months are challenged by the human issues: How will they deal with the sharing of physical resources across the enterprise? We’ve all gotten conditioned to having our own server environments,” he said. Virtual installation will happen, but XenSource’s Crosby understands the change won’t happen overnight, “I think it’s going to be a fairly profound change for the industry to get there.”

 

Read this full article at source

Filed Under: News, Partnerships, People Tagged With: dan kusnetzky, Forrester, illuminata, microsoft, open xchange, red hat, swsoft, virtual server, virtualisation, virtualization, Virtuozzo, vmware, xensource

Primary Sidebar

Tags

acquisition application virtualization Cisco citrix Citrix Systems citrix xenserver cloud computing Dell desktop virtualization EMC financing Funding Hewlett Packard HP Hyper-V IBM industry moves intel interview kvm linux microsoft Microsoft Hyper-V Novell oracle Parallels red hat research server virtualization sun sun microsystems VDI video virtual desktop Virtual Iron virtualisation virtualization vmware VMware ESX VMWorld VMWorld 2008 VMWorld Europe 2008 Xen xenserver xensource

Recent Comments

  • C program on Red Hat Launches Virtual Storage Appliance For Amazon Web Services
  • Hamzaoui on $500 Million For XenSource, Where Did All The Money Go?
  • vijay kumar on NComputing Debuts X350
  • Samar on VMware / SpringSource Acquires GemStone Systems
  • Meo on Cisco, Citrix Join Forces To Deliver Rich Media-Enabled Virtual Desktops

Copyright © 2025 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Newsletter
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About