<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Server 2008 Right On Schedule, But Hypervisor Product Hyper-V Delayed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:51:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Shipping Hyper-V Tomorrow? &#124; Virtualization.com</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Shipping Hyper-V Tomorrow? &#124; Virtualization.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>[...] (finally) give VMware a run for its money. Of course, let&#8217;s not forget Hyper-V was initially scheduled to be part of Windows Server 2008, but was ultimately delayed and rescheduled for availability about six months after its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (finally) give VMware a run for its money. Of course, let&#8217;s not forget Hyper-V was initially scheduled to be part of Windows Server 2008, but was ultimately delayed and rescheduled for availability about six months after its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neterion 10 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter Drivers Embedded In Windows Server 2008 &#124; Virtualization.com</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Neterion 10 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter Drivers Embedded In Windows Server 2008 &#124; Virtualization.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>[...] Server 2008 was announced on February 27th and Hyper-V is currently in beta testing and will be officially launched later [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Server 2008 was announced on February 27th and Hyper-V is currently in beta testing and will be officially launched later [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VM /ETC &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ESX 3i for free with PowerEdge servers?</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>VM /ETC &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ESX 3i for free with PowerEdge servers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>[...] From virtualization.com: &#8220;This doesn’t come as a big surprise, as VMware had added to the previous announcement that hardware vendors would be able to choose which premium they would charge to end customers, if any. Expect the other hardware vendors to follow suit and drop the prices for including the hypervisors significantly (or even zero) if Dell comes through, especially with the sharp-priced Microsoft hypervisor Hyper-V on its way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From virtualization.com: &#8220;This doesn’t come as a big surprise, as VMware had added to the previous announcement that hardware vendors would be able to choose which premium they would charge to end customers, if any. Expect the other hardware vendors to follow suit and drop the prices for including the hypervisors significantly (or even zero) if Dell comes through, especially with the sharp-priced Microsoft hypervisor Hyper-V on its way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Wauters</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wauters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, true, but the post was a combination of the fact that Windows Server 2008 is launching while Hyper-V is &#039;still&#039; delayed but also the fact that eWeek claims this will actually hold back enterprise adoption of WS2008!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, true, but the post was a combination of the fact that Windows Server 2008 is launching while Hyper-V is &#8217;still&#8217; delayed but also the fact that eWeek claims this will actually hold back enterprise adoption of WS2008!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wilson</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/news/2008/02/27/windows-server-2008-right-on-schedule-but-hypervisor-product-hyper-v-delayed/#comment-837</guid>
		<description>This is not news.  Hyper-V has been expected to ship &quot;within 180 days&quot; of Windows Server 2008 RTM for months now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not news.  Hyper-V has been expected to ship &#8220;within 180 days&#8221; of Windows Server 2008 RTM for months now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
