<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CopyCats  in Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:59:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kris Buytaert</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-58302</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Buytaert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/?p=4063#comment-58302</guid>
		<description>@Peter: 

There is a difference between Paravirtualized drivers/devices and a fully Paravirtualized guest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter: </p>
<p>There is a difference between Paravirtualized drivers/devices and a fully Paravirtualized guest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Novodvorsky</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-58082</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Novodvorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/?p=4063#comment-58082</guid>
		<description>VMWare uses paravirtualization and I hope is going to use it further. They are dropping some parts of VMI support, however I hope they will keep support for vmxnet and other paravirtual devices which appeared to be a huge success to vmware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMWare uses paravirtualization and I hope is going to use it further. They are dropping some parts of VMI support, however I hope they will keep support for vmxnet and other paravirtual devices which appeared to be a huge success to vmware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Buytaert (krisbuytaert) 's status on Friday, 13-Nov-09 21:40:52 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-58062</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Buytaert (krisbuytaert) 's status on Friday, 13-Nov-09 21:40:52 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/?p=4063#comment-58062</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/        a few seconds ago  from  mbpidgin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/" rel="nofollow">http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2009/11/13/copycats-in-virtualization/</a>        a few seconds ago  from  mbpidgin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
