<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should VMWare Watch Out For VirtualBox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2008/08/14/should-vmware-watch-out-for-virtualbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2008/08/14/should-vmware-watch-out-for-virtualbox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:51:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Ruschmeyer</title>
		<link>http://virtualization.com/guest-posts/2008/08/14/should-vmware-watch-out-for-virtualbox/comment-page-1/#comment-4919</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ruschmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualization.com/?p=1320#comment-4919</guid>
		<description>Well, if VMWare should be worried, then Parallels should be down right panic stricken as VB, even several releases ago, is well past anything they offer for Windows or Linux users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if VMWare should be worried, then Parallels should be down right panic stricken as VB, even several releases ago, is well past anything they offer for Windows or Linux users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
